Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÀÓÇöõÆ® °íÁ¤Ã¼ÀÇ »ï°¢¹è¿­¿¡ µû¸¥ ÁöÁö°ñÀÇ ÀÀ·Â ºÐ¼®

Finite element stress analysis on supporting bone by tripodal placement of implant fixture

´ëÇÑÄ¡°ú±â°øÇÐȸÁö 2009³â 31±Ç 1È£ p.7 ~ 15
¼Õ¼º½Ä, À̸í°ï,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¼Õ¼º½Ä ( Son Sung-Sik ) - ÀÎÁ¦Ä¡°ú±â°ø¼Ò
À̸í°ï ( Lee Myung-Kon ) - ºÎ»ê°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ »ý¸í°úÇдëÇпø Ä¡±â°øÇаú

Abstract


Purpose: This study was to propose the clear understanding for stress distribution of supporting bone by use of staggered buccal offset tripodal placement of fixtures of posterior 3 crown implant partial dentures. We realized posterior 3 crown implant fixed partial dentures through finite element modeling and analysed stress effect of implant arrangement location to supporting bone under external load using finite element method.

Method: To understand stress distribution of 3 crown implant fixed partial dentures which have 2 different arrangement by finite element analysis. In each model, for loading condition, we applied oblique load to occlusal surface of crown and applied 100 N for 3 crown individually(total 300 N) for imitating possible oral loading condition. at this time, we calculated Von Mises stress distribution in supporting bone through finite element method.

Result: When apply oblique load to in-line arrangement model, maximum stress result for 100 N for each 3 crown 47.566MPa. In tripodal placement, result for 1mm buccal offset tripodal placement implant model was maximum distributed load 51.418MPa, so result was higher than in-line arrangement model.

Conclusion: In stress distribution result by placement of implant fixture, the most effective structure was in-line arrangement. The tripodal placement does not effective for stress distribution, gap cause more damage to supporting bone.

Å°¿öµå

Dental implant;Tripodal placement;Finite element method;von Mises stress

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI